US Needs Consistent Driver Rest Break Rules Scott Olson/Getty Images

US Needs Consistent Driver Rest Break Rules

The ATA says that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994  means that the trucking industry should operate under a single, uniform system from coast-to-coast rather than a patchwork of state laws.

The American Trucking Association called on Congress last week to reject efforts that would impose a patchwork of state scheduling rules on the nation’s foremost movers of goods.

“A single set of consistent and fair regulations is essential to the trucking industry,” said Bill Graves, CEO of  ATA. 

“Language currently being discussed by Congressional leaders would ensure that drivers operate under a consistent set of break rules, whether that driver is delivering a trailer full of water to Flint, Mich., or picking up a load of avocados in Temecula, Calif,” added Graves. “That’s what Congress sought to establish with a 1994 law, and recent interpretations of that law by the courts are threatening that consistency.”

Language in the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 made it clear states are not permitted to institute rules governing the trucking industry because Congress wanted the industry to operate under a single, uniform system from coast-to-coast rather than a confusing and inefficient patchwork of state laws, the group says. 

However, some states – notably California – a handful of courts, and aggressive plaintiffs’ attorneys are refusing to faithfully uphold that goal of one country, one set of rules, according to the ATA.

“If lawmakers do not address this overreach by the states and the courts, they will destroy the unified national rules that Congress intended trucking to operate under,” Graves said. “And moreover, if opponents of this provision succeed in blocking this common sense fix, it only will make an already difficult job unnecessarily complex.”

ATA also chided opponents of this measure for being deceptive in their characterization of the provision’s impacts.

“Federal regulators have said unequivocally that California’s break requirements are not safety rules, as critics have claimed,” said Richard Pianka, ATA’s acting general counsel. “In addition, contrary to the claims of the special interests lobbying against this provision, it will not allow carriers not to pay drivers for all their time. In fact, the legislation expressly requires that drivers being paid by the mile or load receive as much or more than they’d be entitled to if they were paid by the hour.”

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish